This is a WARNING AGAINST JYSKE BANK A/S.
Nogle af mange medvirkende i min historie om at være kunde i Jyske Bank A/S hvilket Dan Stampe Terkelsen var en stor del af, i forbindelse med at have vist sig at Lundgrens advokater var korrupte, da Lundgrens advokater lod sig ansætte og betale af Jyske Bank, og som herefter sørgede for at Lundgrens advokater ved Dan Terkildsen, ikke fremlægger det svig og falsk, som Lundgrens var blevet ansatte til at fremlægge mod mod Jyske Bank for domstolene.
NEWS ABOUT THE JYSKE BANK, AND THE JYSKE BANK BILEN. As Carsten’s private advertisements on these cars are called and my telling is about criminal Danish banks and corrupt Danish lawyers. The Banking News. UPDATED LATEST 28-02-2024. Time. 11.20.
See the video 19 may 2021. Again.
Former covers of banknyt.dk in my diary about being a customer of Denmark’s second largest bank, Jyske Bank, have been shared the dates.
12.02.2016. time. 14:52. / 23.05.2018. time. 21:12. / 09.09.2018. time. 12:52. / 15.03.2020. time. 9:33. / 09.12.2020. time. 7:57. / 22.01.2022. time. 11:35. / 01.03.2022. time. 14:47. / 07.05.2022. time. 8:19. / 29.05.2022. time. 13:14. / 03.06.2022. time. 10:25. / 08.06.2022. time. 6:40. / 23.06.2022. time. 0:32. / 04.07.2022. time. 10:52. / 11.07.2022. time. 8:24. / 07.08.2022. time. 12:02. / 08.09.2022. time. 14:15. / 01.02.2023. time. 12:30. / 05.10.2023. time. 9:36. / 29.01.2024. time. 9:19.
www.Storbjerg.dk
My task, as the one who has been exposed to fraud, by several of Jyske Bank’s employees together in union, my diary is to warn other Jyske Bank customers against trusting the Jyske Bank group and the bank’s cooperation partners as I mentioned here, and and other postings.
If Jyske Bank’s board of directors, management, legal department and your contributing friends believe that Jyske Bank A/S has not committed fraud and forgery, as I tell you in this videos.
Fraud and forgery which the Legal Director Martin Skosted-Nielsen has denied by telephone.
So listen to my call to Jyske Bank from 18 May 2021 again, or listen to a few of the YouTube videos again here from this link.
Otherwise admit and apologize for Jyske Bank’s many offences, that’s the only thing that matters.
If Jyske Bank doesn’t meet a victim like me, who stands up to the giant and says STOP NOW, then Jyske Bank will not change the bank’s disgusting business model.
See again my YouTube video to Jyske Bank fron 18. maj 2021.
In my opinion, Jyske Bank is a dangerous bank, and one you absolutely cannot trust.
25 February 2024. To Legal Director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen and CEO Lars Stensgaard Mørch Jyske Bank, I am simply writing the truth about the fraud Jyske Bank exposed my former company to, the choice is yours as to what else write.
You can just start by admitting and apologizing, for Jyske Bank’s violation of the Land Registration Act 11, and stop threatening me to keep my mouth shut about Jyske Bank’s violations of the law.
If Jyske Bank’s management does not understand what I here in my diary www.banknyt.dk writes just ask me.
So if you will have a personal meeting with me, we can solve your “Jyske Banks” problems, please remember that it is not me, who wants this war, but Jyske Bank, which itself has started, and still contributing to this story about Jyske Bank’s business against the customers, who have chosen to use Jyske Bank, that I have found is a lying bank.
I share here the latest summons, from 5 februar in this link 15 februar 2024. against the Danish Bank Jyske Bank, for violation of the law, more to follow.
04-02-2024. stævning af Jyske Bank Cvr. 17616617. i anerkendelsessøgsmål for overtrædelser af tinglysningslovens § 11, og afgift 1850 kr. Susanne Sørensen Jyske Bank s-sorensen@jyskebank.dk, 89894863 Servicecenter Silkeborg ved Susanne Sørensen, 89894863 s-sorensen@jyskebank.dk har overtrådt tinglysningsloven. find medarbejder.
05-02-2024. stævning Jyske Bank. 1850 kr. overtrædelses af love. sagsnr. BS-6300-2024-HEL. 04-02-2024. stævning af Jyske Bank Cvr. 17616617. i anerkendelsessøgsmål for overtrædelse af tinglysningslovens § 11, og afgift 1850 kr. Susanne Sørensen Jyske Bank s-sorensen@jyskebank.dk, 89894863 Servicecenter Silkeborg ved Susanne Sørensen, 89894863 s-sorensen@jyskebank.dk har overtrådt tinglysningsloven. find medarbejder.
READ HERE. Link about Jyske Bank.
My offer to Jyske Bank A/S, is that I can withdraw the just-initiated case for violation of the Land Registration Act Chase BS-6653/2024-VIB, when Jyske Bank admits that the Bank has violated the law.
Everything else I have said and written since 2016 is not, and will never be part of a settlement, as if not Jyske Bank gives me many more concessions, therefore it will be required that Jyske Bank’s management makes more concessions.
And only if that happens, I will be content to concentrate on the Books surrounding Jyske Bank’s offences.
Martin Skovsted-Nielsen you know, what i have said and written to you, do you have any questions, or something that you or anyone else in Jyske Bank have questions to, or something there want to be corrected, then you should call me at +4522227713. so we can solve small problems.
From my point of view, there is no proposal for a comprehensive solution or for a proposal for a comprehensive settlement, Jyske Bank wants from me, then it is concessions that must be on the table, so we are unlikely to reach the goal after Jyske Bank claims that I am lying , this conclusion is in connection with the bank’s denials and actions.
With reference to my emails, as this.
8. august 2023.
10. august 2023.
And my email 11. august 2023. and to the email by Martin Skovsted-Nielsen wrote on 11 August 2023 at 11.55.
The ball is still in Jyske Bank, and their threats of libel suit have no influence on my books about Jyske Bank’s business methods.
I rejected this email from Martin Skibsted-Nielsen with a proposal the same day 11 August 2023.
Read my email 12 august 2023.
I am a little late, in sharing a copy of the subpoena against Jyske Bank A/S, for by Susanne Soerensen as have made a violation of section 11 of the Land Registration Act.
Jyske Bank by the lawyers continues to deny, that some in Jyske Bank A/S have done something wrong, or that someone in Jyske Bank had lied at any time, such as here where, for example, Nicolai Hansen lies that the customer has borrowed DKK 4,328,000 which Jysk Bank by Nicolai Hansen, in a letter to Jyske Bank has been informed, evidence for this is below in Photos.
You can read more about this, and much more in the books that I am writes on, and action is as shared here 31 December 2020, where Jyske Bank by mee wishes a happy New Year, a link is shared with Jyske Bank last 19 february 2024.
Jyske Bank had received a summons from the court, on February 21, 2024, the court writes that if Jyske Bank does not respond to this summons within 7 days, the court will sends a legal person, to deliver the summons “the case”, which is a recognition case for violation of the Land Registration Act.
Jyske Bank’s legal director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen announced by telephone on Tuesday 21 February, that the case would be dismissed, as I cannot have both a claim for recognition and a financial loss in a same case, to which I have replied that the claim will be changed to a pure claim for Acknowledgment of case concerning Jyske Bank’s violation of the Property Registration Act.
HERE IS A LINK TO THE SUMMONS DOCUMENT.
AND LINK TO DOCUMENT ATTACHED MY SUMMONS FROM JYSKE BANK.
When I think about all the offenses, that Denmark’s second largest #Bank, Jyske Bank A/S is demonstrably behind, and that the Bank neither regrets, nor wants to apologise, it shows after my opinion a clear picture of Jyske Bank’s foundation, which is anything else but honest and honorable.
That is why I have also made it quite clear to the members of Jyske Bank A/S, as well to the bord members and the management by Lars Stensgaard Mørch, Niels Erik Jacobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Trier Schleidt, and to Martin Skovsted-Nielsen, and many more.
I repeat again, if Jyske Bank has something they want me to correct, in what I have written since 2016, call me +4522227713.
And let’s meet to review what I have written and compare it with my documentation, if there are any mistakes or misunderstandings on my part, I will of course be happy to correct them.
But to think that Jyske Bank by threats, can silence me, after the fraud that the bank has exposed me and my company to, that is not going to happen, I refer again to my many years of inquiries that i have sendt or offered to Jyske Bank A/S.
That my books will exist, so that everyone may not be in doubt, that Jyske Bank’s employees are welcome to lie, without the bank’s lawyers and the management at Lars Stensgaard Mørch, Niels Erik Jacobsen, Per Skovhus, Peter Trier Schleidt, and as Martin Skovsted-Nielsen necessarily not seeing anything wrong with lying, the bank will after all, just call it a mistake, if it is discovered.
I write facts about my personal experiences and experiences with having been a customer of a big Danish bank, where exploitation, manipulation of documents and lies were used to hide the cunning fraud, where Jyske Bank started fraud on December 30, 2008, when several employees together in union, chose to start with calculating interest on a loan of DKK 4,328,000 that never had existed LINK, but which Nicolai Hansen, in collaboration with Casper Dam Olsen, managed to lie about when I, as a customer was seriously ill after a major brain haemorrhage.
This has already been written after I had to fire Lundgren’s lawyers.
When there was a well-founded suspicion that Jyske Bank had bribed Lundgrens law firm to not present my accusations and claims against the Jyske Bank group at the return commission.
Link procedural document 27 oktober 2019.
.
Link 31 March 2023. The plaintiff’s comments in the accounts.
In my opinion, Jyske Bank’s employees have clearly taken advantage of the fact that, I had a large brain hemorrhage, and then could not remember, so that the employees as Nicolaj Hansen could lie in bad faith, that I as a customer have already received the loan of DKK 4,328,000
As Jyske Bank A/S since 30 December 2008. has calculated interest, which the Jyske Bank group therefore wanted to hide had not been taken home, therefore it was also extremely powerful for, among others, Nicolai Hansen and Casper Dam Olsen to lie together about this loan.
From the beginning, it has been in power for Jyske Bank’s employees to lie directly about the customer having borrowed DKK 4,328,000 in order to cover up, that the Jyske Bank A/S group by Nicolai Hansen, Jeanett Kofoed-Hansen.
Jeanett Kofoed-Hansen and Nicolai Hansen, has helped Lars Aaquist to start an interest rate swap on DKK 4,328,000 for this alleged underlying loan of DKK 4,328,000 for Jyske Bank’s Swap. “Lars Aaquist there today
is employed by Danske Bank A/S.”
The value of this fraudulent number is in the region of 3.5 million Danish kroner, which seemed to be the background for lying to the customer, to the Swedish Financial Institution Appeal Board and again to lie to the courts that this underlying loan of DKK 4,328,000 has been taken home and later changed.
Jyske Bank succeeded in using several employees to hide this for 10 years, helped by the customer’s serious illness, which is why Jyske Bank demanded that the case be dismissed as out of date, as the fraud was not discovered within the first 3 years.
Jyske Bank on 31 December 2008 initiated an interest rate swap of DKK 4,328,000 for a loan that never existed, at this time there was not even an offer, yet Jyske Bank has set the amount to negative DKK 560,000 to close the interest rate swap, that this date alone is a historical fraud, carried out by several employees together in association.
Legal Director Martin Skovsted Nielsen has stated in February 2024 that he does not think it is lying when employees are not telling the truth.
At the same time, Martin Skovsted Nielsen threatened that Jyske Bank would bring a libel case against me for what I have written here in my diary www.banknyt.dk page, if I do not keep my mouth shut about Jyske Bank’s business, and delete everything I have written through them many years about Jyske Bank A/S’s way of conducting banking business, this is out of the question as it is material for the books I am writing on.
12 august 2023. TIL BØGERNE OM KORRUPTION OG 1 KRIMINEL BANK I DANMARK. : SE BEVISER FOR JYSKE BANKS BEDRAGERI HER. SE DE YOUTUBE VIDEOER SOM SIDEN 3. MAJ 2021. ER BLEVET DELT AF JYSKE BANKS FJENDE NR. 1. CARSTEN STORBJERG@JYSKEBANK. JYSKE BANKS FUNDAMENT.
Here is a completely different offer 6 May 2009, for a completely different project, which Jyske Bank employed Nicolai Hansen “as today is employed at Jyske Bank Hillerød Slotsgade 19.” but that Nicolai Hansen, who is 100% aware that I have not borrowed the DKK 4,328,000, chooses to lie in February 2010, probably to hide that Jyske Bank A/S on 30 December 2008 started fraud against the customer’s company.
Jyske Bank itself believes that it is neither lying nor fraud, as it is obviously normal for the bank’s employees to call more lies more mistakes.
The bank’s lawyers do not want to admit the way I and my company have been treated, clearly is not a rarity, but rather Jyske Bank’s foundation.
An offer of DKK 4,328,000, which was rejected and expired on 20 November 2008.
The fact that the offer has lapsed is made absolutely clear to the Jyske Bank Helsingoer branch by Nicolai Hansen.
However, this did not stop Nicolai Hansen from lying, which I claim is in bad faith, my diary www.banknyt.dk is important for my overall experience of being a customer of a big lying Danish bank.
Nicolai Hansen has subsequently moved from Jyske Bank Helsingør to Jyske Bank Hilleroed branch, Slotsgade 19, 3400,
Here, Nicolai Hansen lies together with Casper Dam Olsen that the underlying loan for the swap has been restructured.
Nicolai Hansen has admitted that he wrote the email in collaboration with Casper Dam Olsen.
Both are permanent employees of Jyske Bank Hilleroed Slotsgade 19, 3400,
Back to Jyske Bank’s violation of section 11 of the Property Registration Act
Of course, for 3 years now I have requested the Jyske Bank group to admit and apologize for having deleted my private mortgage deed without my consent, as the law requires, but Jyske Bank refuses to admit violations of the law and Jyske Bank also refuses to apologize for the bank’s violations of the law, I has therefore sued the lying Jyske Bank myself, the proceedings of which I am sharing here on 25 February.
A recognition case for violation of the Land Registration Act, which Legal Director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen denies is some violation of Danish legislation, and which Martin says is a case Jyske Bank will have rejected.
I am thinking again of when Supreme Court judge Kurt Rasmussen, and partners Birgitte Frølund from Horten lawyers as well as Jens Steen Jensen from Kromann Reumert and Deputy Director from Dansk Erhverv Henrik Hyltoft, ther in the bar council decided that the clients for Danish lawyers, does not decide on their own lawsuit, and decided at same time that it is not a breach of good legal practice, when the client’s lawyers withhold several pleadings from their client, nor would they hand over a pleading to the client upon request.
Refers to the complaint about the corrupt Lundgren lawyers. LINK.
LINK Read the case, summons, and see attachments in the case against Jyske #Bank, the district court, Viborg. SEE SHARED YOUTUBE VIDEOS AT THIS LINK.
See the video 19 may 2021. Again.
Former covers of banknyt.dk in my diary about being a customer of Denmark’s second largest bank, Jyske Bank, have been shared the dates.
12.02.2016. time. 14:52. / 23.05.2018. time. 21:12. / 09.09.2018. time. 12:52. / 15.03.2020. time. 9:33. / 09.12.2020. time. 7:57. / 22.01.2022. time. 11:35. / 01.03.2022. time. 14:47. / 07.05.2022. time. 8:19. / 29.05.2022. time. 13:14. / 03.06.2022. time. 10:25. / 08.06.2022. time. 6:40. / 23.06.2022. time. 0:32. / 04.07.2022. time. 10:52. / 11.07.2022. time. 8:24. / 07.08.2022. time. 12:02. / 08.09.2022. time. 14:15. / 01.02.2023. time. 12:30. / 05.10.2023. time. 9:36. / 29.01.2024. time. 9:19.
Jyske Bank management. I again encourage the bank to look through the many years of postings, mail, letters and so one, if you find something you don’t agree with, say so and hold a meeting with me, so that we can correct any mistakes or misunderstandings together.
Regards, Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup +4522227713
When Jyske Bank on 11 August 2023. By Jyske Bank’s Legal Director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen.
To the Lawyers and management, as well as Susanne Sørensen 11 august 13.00. LINK. who was the one who committed a violation of the land registration act for Jyske Bank
As to reply to thise emails on 11 August 13.10. LINK. to, among others, Susanne Sørensen Jyske Bank Silkeborg.
And when legal director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen who in this email 14.55. LINK. for the first time reply to several years of emails, and Denies all circumstances, including violation of the Land Registry Act.
Then Jyske Bank’s business methods suddenly become much more interesting.
www.banknyt.dk
26-01-2024. 16.20. KLAGE. HVOR JYSKE BANK VED SUSANNE SØRENSEN MENER AT HAVE FÅET MIN TILLADELSE TIL AT SLETTE MIT PRIVAT PANT I DEN OMTALTE EJENDOM. SØVEJ 5. 3100
23-01-2024. 13.08. Gentager igen, Jeg ønsker fred og også at sikker at Jyske Bank samt deres advokater holder op med at lyve, samt at Jyske Bank fremover vil overholde lovgivningen
19-01-2024. 22.23. til Jyske bank Omkring modtagelse af mit originale patebrev, hvilket JB ved mindst Susanne Sørensen har lavet forandring i, uden ejernes samtykke en overtrædelse af tinglysningsloven § 11
19-01-2024. 15.40. mail til Jyske Bank _ Endeligt Møde Referat, sendt delvist til Jyske Bank A_S. Henholdsvis den 9, 10 og 11. Januar uden nogle rettelser
26-01-2024. 01.26. Klage. anmoder dokumenterer hvor Jyske Bank ved Susanne Sørensen mener at have fået min tilladelse til at slette mit privat Pant i den omtalte ejendom. Søvej 5. 3100
These documents for the time being 1-48. are for use in the case of Jyske Bank’s violation of the Land Registration Act.
Jyske Bank does not itself believe that it is a violation of the provisions of the Property Registration Act when Jyske Bank takes an action contrary to what is stated in the law, the only thing I want and ask Jyske Bank for is that the bank makes concessions and that Jyske Bank’s management apologize, the BANK REFUSES this, therefore Jyske Bank has been subpoenaed to obtain a judgment, and the judge has only to judge according to what is written in the law.
BS-6653/2024-VIB
Att Danish.
BS-6653/2024-VIB
I sagen bør bilag 1, 4, 22, “bilag 23“, og 29. alt andet være nok til at få Jyske Bank dømt i en anerkendelse sag for overtrædelse af tinglysningsloven, jeg fremhæver også ond tro.
Dette handler om at banker principielt har lov til at foretage forandringer i kundernes pantebreve uden samtykke eller tilladelse, imod ejernes ønsker.
Attached files. “Correspondence attached from 12 January 2021. to 16 March 2021.”
Bilag 1. 12-01-2021. 15.16. Mail og brev i mail 15.16. til Hej Jyske Bank Tina Agergaard 12-01-20…
Bilag 2. 14-01-2021. 14.47. Fra Jyske Bank Tina Agergaard svare mailen og brev 12-01. Venligst v…
Bilag 3. 14-01-2021. 15.12. til Jyske Bank Tina Agergaard. – Venligst vedr. pant i Bybjergvej 43….
Bilag 4. 15-01-2021. 14.20. mail Fra Jysk Banks advokater LES, Kristian Ambjørn, en besvarelse af…
Bilag 5. 20-01-2021. 13.46 – 21-01. 08.48. 3. mails -MØDE. Ved betaling til Jyske Bank, anmoder o…
Bilag 6. 20-01-2021. 15.51. salg. opgørelse af lån. Mails 15 til 20 januar 2021. hvor Jyske Bank …
Bilag 7. 21-01-2021. 10.27. Til Jyske Bank Tina Agergaard. ønsker dokumenter retur vedr. pant. sk…
Bilag 8. 21-01-2021. 11.24. Mail med brev fra Jyske Bank Lund Elmer Sandager der oplyser banken i…
Bilag 9. 21-01-2021. 11.48. Til Jyske Bank Tina Agergaard. ønsker Salgsfuldmagter der er givet s…
Bilag 10. 23-01-2021. 16.27. Til Jyske Bank Tina Agergaard Salgsfuldmagter ønskes retur søvej 5….
Bilag 20. 05-02-2021.16.51. Fra LES. bekrafter Sletning af bankens underpant i ejerpantebrevet i …
Bilag 21. 11-02-2021. 14.09. LES meddeler at der er sket indfrielse og at Pantebrev 2.000.000 eft…
Bilag 22. 15-02-2021. 14.01. til JB. Tina Agergaard og LES – LÆS TEKST I OVERFØRELSER SÅ DER IKKE…
Bilag 23. 15-02-2021. 14.58. – Tina JB meddeler at have givet Regina Hjort besked, om mail kl. 14…
Bilag 24. 16-02-2021. 11.52 tIl JB Tina LES, om sikkerheder underskrevet, disse sikkerheder er h…
Bilag 25. 19-02-2021. 12.28. JB LES. Tina sørg for at jeg kan afhente pantebrev, 3.000.000 dkk ha…
Bilag 26- 23-02-2021. 12.32. til JB. LES. Tina Agergaard. vedr. Lån sikkerhed i pantebrev 3.000.0…
Bilag 27. 24-02-2021. 14.14. til LES JB. Tina Aggergaard, med kontoudtog. Mangler stadig saldokvi…
Bilag 28. 24-02-2021. 17.08. til JB. Tina Agergaard, LES. MUG. Direktion. JB anbefales udskifte L…
Bilag 29. 26.02.2021. 09.03. Susanne Sørensen overtræder for Jyske Bank Tinglysningslovens § 11. …
Bilag 31. 02-03-2021. 11.46. Fra LES og til JB. MUG. brev. Indfrielse svar 15, 19, 23, 24. 26. fe…
Bilag 32. 02-03-2021. 14.01. til les- pantebrevet kr. 3.000.000 i min Ejendom Søvej 5. 3100 Hornb…
Bilag 33. 02-03-2021. 14.01. til LES. der er flere fejl som JB har lavet, Banken skal overholde l…
Bilag 34. 08-03-2021. 00.50. til LES. JB. Tina Agergaard – Ret venligst fejl som Jyske Bank har l…
Bilag 35. 10-03-2021. 11.27. Vedr. Mine henvendelser at Jyske Bank har lavet flere fejl og uberet…
Bilag 36. 10-03-2021. 11.30. fra LES. JB MUG. med brev, tilbyder at lave ny pantsætning, i stedet…
Bilag 40. 15-03-2021. 12.10. til JB LES Tina Agergaard MUG. Storbjerg anklager for overtrædelse …
Bilag 41. 16-03-2021. 11.27. til K-Toft MUG. og LES. CS afviser at der er en aftale Dokument kl…
Bilag 42. 31-05-2023. 18.17. fra CS Hvem har fortaget udsletning af mit personlige .pant. Ejerpan…
Bilag 43. 11-06-2023. 17.12. fra CS Min dør er åben og jeg Carsten syntes vi skal tale sammen, og…
Bilag 44. 13-01-2024. 07.12. mail til Jyske Bank med Endeligt Møde Referat, sendt Jyske Bank har…
Bilag 45. 18-01-2024. S.1-15- Kvitering for modtagelse af gamle privat pantebrev 3.000.000 jævnfø…
Bilag 46. 26-01-2024. 01.26. Klage. anmoder dokumenterer hvor Jyske Bank ved Susanne Sørensen men…
Bilag 47. 11-08-2023. 13.10. mail til Jyske Bank, med delt brev.. bekræft og svar venligst om jeg…
https://banknyt.dk/26-01-2024-klage-jeg-skal-venligst-anmode-jyske-bank-fremvise-hvor-i-
denne-vedhaeftet-korrespondance-hvor-jyske-bank-ved-susanne-soerensen-mener-at-
have-faaet-min-tilladelse-til-at-slette-mit-privat/
26-01-2024. COMPLAINT. I MUST REQUEST PLEASE JYSKE BANK SHOW WHERE IN THIS ATTACHMENT CORRESPONDENCE WHERE JYSKE BANK KNOWS SUSANNE SØRENSEN BELIEVES TO HAVE GOT MIN PERMISSION TO DELETE MY PRIVATE MORTGAGE IN IT. MENTIONED PROPERTY. SOEVEJ 5, 3100.
My mail to Jyske Bank A/S. 30-01-2024. 16.00. Referring to the complaint. I request the bank’s employees who received the letter on 12 January 2021. to explain themselves, as they are witnesses to what I have written, when Susanne Sørensen on 26 February 2021. deleted the mortgage of DKK 3,000,000. READ THE ENTIRE MAIL THANK YOU .
30-01-2024. 16.00. Med henvisning til klagen. Jeg anmode at banken ansatte der har modtaget brevet 12 januar 2021. om at forklare sig, da de er vidner til det jeg har skrevet, forud for at Susanne Sørensen slettede Pantet er på 3.000.000 kr. LÆS HELE MAIL TAK.
Now try again to see the emails and letters that I send to Jyske Bank here in the link’s. Read my emails.
Dit or dit Jyske Bank NOT get my Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup approval, when Susanne Sørensen for Jyske Bank A/S, In bad faith and simultaneously chose to change my private owned mortgage deed, which Jyske Bank chose to delete contrary to the owner’s instructions.
Regardless, Jyske Bank has a peculiar understanding of the law, the law states that it requires the owner’s consent to make changes to a mortgage deed, which Appendix 1. 12 January 2021. makes it quite clear that Jyske Bank must not cancel the customer’s mortgage in the real estate, Which Jyske Bank service center Silkeborg by Susanne Sørensen anyway on 26 February 2021, chooses to do in bad faith.
Then Jyske Bank deleted my mortgage of 3,000,000 in the private property, located in Søvej 5. 3100 Hornbæk.
Or
Did Jyske Bank NOT get my Carsten Storbjerg Skaarup’s approval, before Susanne Sørensen made changes in my private deed mortgage, and deleted my mortgage of 3,000,000 in the property located Søvej 5. 3100 Hornbæk.
These 6 people, have all received the letter, that I wrote to Tina Agergaard on 12 January 2021, page 2, in the letter, in which I expressly wrote.
See Appendix 1, page 3. letter to Tina Agergaard Jyske Bank, which shares my instructions with at least the bank’s lawyers Lund Elmer Sandager.
In this appendix 1. it is clearly document that.
The mortgage is DKK 3,000,000.
Must not be cancelled.
See Appendix 4, 15 January 2021. sent from Jyske Bank’s lawyer Lund Elmer Sandager by Kristian Ambjørn Buus-Nielsen, sent to Søren Ivarsen Jyske Bank, Morten Ulrik Gade Jyske Bank, Tina Agergaard Jyske Bank,
There are therefore at least 5. employees in Jyske Bank as Regina Hjort Ernstsen, who have had knowledge of my instructions, not to cancelled The mortgage DKK 3,000,000.
Bilag 22. 15-02-2021. 14.01. til JB. Tina Agergaard og LES – LÆS TEKST I OVERFØRELSER SÅ DER IKKE…
Bilag 23. 15-02-2021. 14.58. – Tina JB meddeler at have givet Regina Hjort besked, om mail kl. 14…
Bilag 24. 16-02-2021. 11.52 tIl JB Tina LES, om sikkerheder underskrevet, disse sikkerheder er h…
Bilag 25.19-02-2021. 12.28. JB LES. Tina vil du sørger for at jeg kan afhente pantebrev, 3.000.00…
Until Susanne Sørensen from Jyske Bank, after my many inquiries See Appendix 4. 26 February 2021. cancel my mortgage of DKK 3,000,000 against what I have written to Jyske Bank.
The Danish Financial Supervisory Authority doesn’t care, the Land Registry doesn’t care, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Finance, the Parliament The government don’t care that Denmark’s second largest bank, won’t comply with the law.
There is no doubt that Denmark’s second largest bank #JYSKEBANK refuses to comply with Danish legislation, which the Legal Director of Jyske bank Martin Skovsted-Nielsen has signed on 11 August 2023. to deny that any violation of the law has been made, and therefore also refuses to make concessions and apologies.
SEE here some more sheared letters and mails to Jyske Bank.
I am writing in my diary to emphasize that Jyske Bank’s board and management have no interest in complying with the applicable laws and regulations, as otherwise the bank would immediately admit violations of the Land Registration Act, and apologize and promise that Jyske Bank will in future take hard action against the employees who violate the law for Jyske Bank.
Here in my diary, you can read about my experiences at Jyske Bank, about being a customer at a bank where lies and document manipulation, abuse and exploitation were a large part of Jyske Bank’s business.
I want to start with when Jyske Bank’s employee Susanne Sørensen in service center Silkeborg, without consent and against my instructions, canceled my private mortgage of DKK 3 million, in a property.
I have requested the Jyske Bank A/S management, legal and the bank’s Legal Director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen to admit and exculpate for violation of Section 11 of the Public Registry Act.
28-01-2024. mail til Jyske Bank ved direktionen, Juridisk og juridisk direktør Martin Skovsted-Nielsen, ønsker at Jyske Bank rette op på deres misforståelser, samt at indrømme overtrædelser af loven.
26-01-2024. 01.26. Klage. anmoder dokumenterer hvor Jyske Bank ved Susanne Sørensen mener at have fået min tilladelse til at slette mit privat Pant i den omtalte ejendom. Søvej 5. 3100
26-01-2024. 16.20. KLAGE. HVOR JYSKE BANK VED SUSANNE SØRENSEN MENER AT HAVE FÅET MIN TILLADELSE TIL AT SLETTE MIT PRIVAT PANT I DEN OMTALTE EJENDOM. SØVEJ 5. 3100
Jyske Bank’s Legal Director Martin Skovsted-Nielsen for Jyske Bank has denied this.
Here in my diary, I will tell with full documentation about the offenses that I have found out that Jyske Bank employees are behind.
Jyske Bank and the involved employees in the group, have at no time wanted to answer anything, nor have they wanted to help with clarification, since my first edition of the diary that I wrote in the period 2 February 2016 until today.
At no time has the Jyske Bank group, wanted to comment on anything, despite my many and countless inquiries I am asking them to make corrections, if the bank did not agree with what I wrote in the diary.
When the little citizen in Denmark, writes to the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority that Jyske Bank A/S is committing legal offences, the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority does not care, they do not interfere in the individual legal offences, or simple cases that Jyske Bank is behind.
As long as it only happens against individual persons, or against companies that Jyske Bank can expose for offences without risk, investigation for violation of the law.
Neither the Police, the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority, nor the Danish Government have shown any interest, in wanting to stop banks that are openly breaking the law, as I have written and documented here in my diary since 2016.
Now that Jyske Bank has committed a violation of the Land Registration Act.
I simply asked the bank’s management, executive board, and legal to admit and apologize, this was refused by Kristian Ambjørn Buus-Nielsen Lund Elmer Sandager lawyers, Morten Ulrik Gade Jyske Bank, Martin Skovsted-Nielsen Legal Director and the actual violator Susanne Sørensen Jyske Bank.
But because it is political that the state, such as the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (as FSA “Finanstilsynet.), who chooses to behaves passively, about what they have read about Jyske Bank’s violations of the law, and in that way cover up banks that, like Jyske Bank, have repeatedly violated the law.
The victims are left alone without help and without legal certainty.
Just as when the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority was presented by me personally back in April / May 2019 with documentation that Jyske Bank A/S had committed mandate fraud, document forgery, false, and that Lund Elmer Sandager lawyers had lied to the court in another case, the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority replied that they did not want to investigate Jyske Bank, as there was a small civil legal case.
This lawsuit against Jyske Bank ther had been taken over by Lundgren’s lawyers, whom Jyske Bank shortly afterwards employed, to advise Jyske Bank in a transaction for 600,000,000 Danish kroner.
At the same time as Jyske Bank A/S employed Lundgren’s lawyers, Lundgren’s lawyers took care not to present the client’s fraud and false allegations against Jyske Bank.
Lundgren’s lawyers also took care, to hide and withhold several pleadings from the client, who employed Lundgren’s lawyers to present Jyske Bank’s use of fraud and fake.
It is most important to inform those who read along in my private diary.
That employees and employees Supreme Court Judge Kurt Rasmussen, partner in Kromann Reumert lawyers Jens Steen Jensen, Partner in Horten lawyers Birgitte Frølund, CO in Dansk Erhverv “Danish Business” Deputy Director Henrik Hyltoft and Nævnenes Hus by Rikke Skadhauge Seerup Krogsgård does not believe that it is a breach of good legal practice, to withhold pleadings from the clients.
Just as they all together in the association have agreed that the client who employed Lundgren’s lawyers does not decide for himself what the client’s claims against Jyske Bank must be.
In this case, there was full agreement in the bar panel that it was only Lundgren’s lawyers, who alone decided what the client’s claims against Jyske Bank might be, just as the panel decided that it was not a breach of good legal practice that Jyske Bank’s employment of Lundgren’s lawyers in a trade for DKK 600 million.
Which was prior to Lundgren’s lawyers choosing to withhold and hide several pleadings from the client, who in this way was kept out of his own lawsuit against Jyske Bank.
READ THE KOMPLET AGAINST LUNDGRENS. 05-06-2020.
Jyske Bank used all this to demand, that the case against Jyske Bank should be dismissed, during the limitation period, when the bank submitted that Jyske Bank’s fraud and forgery were submitted to late.
And that together with Jyske Bank’s demand, that the case should be dismissed with the fact, that Jyske Bank’s fraud was not discovered within 3 years, that caused that the judge dismiss the case, under the statute of limitations, as Jyske Bank wanted.
I believe that my books about Jyske Bank give a good picture of Danish banks’ way of working, and that they show who in Denmark opposes legal certainty when banks such as Jyske Bank violate the law.